Skip to main content
영어 연습 시험englishpracticeexam.com
연습 시험시험 가이드요금제
로그인회원가입
영어 연습 시험

English Practice Exam · englishpracticeexam.com

영어 능력 시험 성공을 돕는 무료 연습 시험.

빠른 링크

  • 홈
  • 연습 시험
  • 요금제

법적 정보

  • 개인정보 처리방침
  • 서비스 약관
  • 문의하기

다른 언어

한국어العربيةবাংলাEnglishFrançaisગુજરાતીहिन्दीBahasa Indonesia日本語Bahasa Melayu普通话नेपालीPortuguês (Brasil)ਪੰਜਾਬੀEspañolภาษาไทยTiếng Việt

© 2025 영어 연습 시험. All rights reserved.

웹사이트 제작: S-Block TechnologiesS-Block Technologies
  1. 홈
  2. /
  3. Cambridge
  4. /
  5. C1 Advanced
  6. /
  7. 파트 8
  8. /
  9. 연습 시험
C1Reading and Use of English파트 8

Multiple matching

You are going to read an extract. For questions 1-10, choose from the sections (A-E). The sections may be chosen more than once.

The Four-Day Week: Progress, Privilege, or Problem?

The impact of the four-day work week on productivity, wellbeing, and society

A tempting promise: more life, same output

When companies announce a four-day week, the headlines make it sound like a minor miracle: fewer hours, identical productivity, and employees who suddenly have time to cook, exercise and phone their grandparents. I understand the excitement. The most convincing pilots I’ve seen didn’t simply “cut Friday”; they redesigned how work happens—shorter meetings, clearer priorities, fewer layers of approval. In those cases, output didn’t fall because a lot of the old schedule was never truly productive in the first place. Still, I’m wary of the triumphal tone. Some roles depend on being available rather than producing a neat deliverable, and not every team has the power to refuse last-minute requests. The four-day week can be a genuine improvement, but only if it’s treated as an organisational change, not a motivational poster. Otherwise, the same workload is squeezed into fewer days and everyone just looks busier while feeling more exhausted.

Questions
Select section:
ABCDE
1.

Which section/person suggests that a four-day week only works when organisations rethink how work is organised, rather than simply removing a day?

2.

Which section/person warns that some jobs are defined by being on hand for others, making a shorter week harder to implement fairly?

3.

In which section does the writer argue that ‘productivity’ is not a single straightforward measure and can look different depending on what you value?

4.

Which section/person implies that some reported ‘successes’ may be misleading because employees keep targets up by working outside official hours?

5.

Which section/person highlights that the policy could deepen divisions inside the same organisation, with some teams enjoying long weekends while others must remain accessible?

6.

Which section/person questions the claim that a four-day week automatically improves equality for parents, pointing out practical obstacles outside the workplace?

7.

Which section/person suggests that the biggest barrier to making the change succeed is not timetabling, but workplace attitudes that reward long hours and constant visibility?

8.

In which section does the writer express both optimism about the benefits and criticism of how casually organisations claim the transition will be easy?

9.

Which section/person contrasts possible environmental gains with ways the extra day off could cancel them out through different leisure or consumption choices?

10.

Which section/person argues that the public often frames the four-day week too narrowly as an internal workplace benefit, ignoring broader effects on society and infrastructure?

0 of 10 answered

← Multiple matching의 모든 시험으로 돌아가기C1 Advanced의 모든 섹션 보기

지금 멈추지 마세요

꾸준히 연습하는 수험생은 시험 당일 훨씬 높은 점수를 받습니다. 지금의 학습 흐름을 이어가세요.

수천 명의 수험생이 신뢰하는 서비스

$8/month

하루 $0.27 미만

  • 모든 연습 시험, 무제한 이용
  • 작문 과제 AI 피드백
  • 언제든지 취소 가능 — 부담 없이
무제한 연습 시작하기

이미 계정이 있으신가요? Log in

무료로 가입하고 연습을 시작하세요. Sign up

Also practice for:

IELTSTOEFLTOEICPTE Academic