Skip to main content
영어 연습 시험englishpracticeexam.com
연습 시험시험 가이드요금제
로그인회원가입
영어 연습 시험

English Practice Exam · englishpracticeexam.com

영어 능력 시험 성공을 돕는 무료 연습 시험.

빠른 링크

  • 홈
  • 연습 시험
  • 요금제

법적 정보

  • 개인정보 처리방침
  • 서비스 약관
  • 문의하기

다른 언어

한국어العربيةবাংলাEnglishFrançaisગુજરાતીहिन्दीBahasa Indonesia日本語Bahasa Melayu普通话नेपालीPortuguês (Brasil)ਪੰਜਾਬੀEspañolภาษาไทยTiếng Việt

© 2025 영어 연습 시험. All rights reserved.

웹사이트 제작: S-Block TechnologiesS-Block Technologies
  1. 홈
  2. /
  3. Cambridge
  4. /
  5. C1 Advanced
  6. /
  7. 파트 8
  8. /
  9. 연습 시험
C1Reading and Use of English파트 8

Multiple matching

You are going to read an extract. For questions 1-10, choose from the sections (A-E). The sections may be chosen more than once.

Beyond the Steering Wheel: Rethinking Urban Travel

How cities can reduce car use without harming daily life

The Promise (and the Panic) of Car-Light Streets

When our city announced a ‘car-light’ plan, the reaction was immediate: cyclists celebrated, shop owners predicted ruin, and drivers asked—fairly—how they were meant to get their children to school in the rain. What surprised me wasn’t the disagreement but the certainty on both sides. Supporters talked as if removing cars automatically creates community; critics insisted it automatically destroys convenience. Neither is guaranteed. A street with fewer cars can be quieter, safer and more pleasant, yet it can also become a corridor of delivery vans if planners forget that goods still need to move. And while a ten-minute walk sounds charming on a sunny Saturday, it feels like a punishment when you’re carrying groceries after a late shift. Still, the enthusiasm isn’t baseless: cities that have reduced traffic often report better air quality and fewer accidents. The question is whether the benefits arrive for everyone or only for those who can afford to live near the centre.

Questions
Select section:
ABCDE
1.

Which section/person suggests that both supporters and opponents of reducing car use are overconfident about what will happen?

2.

Which section/person points out that limiting private cars can still leave a street dominated by other vehicles if logistics aren’t planned properly?

3.

In which section does the writer imply that the advantages of traffic reduction may mainly help people in central, wealthier areas?

4.

Which section/person criticises the way people judge public transport more harshly than driving by using different standards?

5.

Which section/person argues that dependable, frequent services and good disruption information matter more than high-tech innovations in getting people to change their habits?

6.

Which section/person mentions that without late-night public transport, some workers will still see a car as the only realistic choice?

7.

Which section/person describes changing their mind after personal experience and realising that minimal cycle provision doesn’t count as genuine infrastructure?

8.

Which section/person expresses discomfort with portraying one group of road users as morally superior to another?

9.

Which section/person argues that charging for parking can rapidly influence behaviour, but warns that poorly designed charges may be seen as unfair to those with fewer housing choices?

10.

Which section/person highlights that working from home reduced some journeys but also created new patterns of travel, and implies the benefits were distributed unevenly across job types?

0 of 10 answered

← Multiple matching의 모든 시험으로 돌아가기C1 Advanced의 모든 섹션 보기

지금 멈추지 마세요

꾸준히 연습하는 수험생은 시험 당일 훨씬 높은 점수를 받습니다. 지금의 학습 흐름을 이어가세요.

수천 명의 수험생이 신뢰하는 서비스

$8/month

하루 $0.27 미만

  • 모든 연습 시험, 무제한 이용
  • 작문 과제 AI 피드백
  • 언제든지 취소 가능 — 부담 없이
무제한 연습 시작하기

이미 계정이 있으신가요? Log in

무료로 가입하고 연습을 시작하세요. Sign up

Also practice for:

IELTSTOEFLTOEICPTE Academic